600 Provincial Court Proceedings, 1661.

Liber
P. C. R.
Coll Wm
Evans v.
Thomas
Turner

The def^t not appeareing Ordered that the Sherriff produce the
def^t or his Attorney by the next Co^rt or to stand to the Award of the
Co^rt

Thomas
Turner v.
Coll Wm
Evans
John
Abington v.
W^m Lowry

The Pit not appeareing a [non] suite is granted to the def^t.

The plt sueth as in his petⁿ fo: 1113. and itt appeareing by the
oathe of M^r Trueman that the land demanded is in the Bound of the
s^d Pattent, The def^t denyes that itt is within the Bounds of the s^d
Pattent, and desires tyme till tomorrow morning to proue itt.
M^r Trueman sweares that M^r Abington came to him in the Com-
pany of W^m Lowry, and did shew him a Bound Tree from which
bound tree he run according to the Pattent three hund^d and twenty
perches, and did include most parte of the land which W^m Lowry did
then live vpon, and further sayth not.
Sworne in open Co^rt John Gittings Clre.

p. 1139
Capt. Josias
Fendall &
Robert
Hunley
Admnrs. to
Christopher
Russell v.
Robert Sly
Adminr. to
Samuel
Smith

Yo^r pet^rs therefore humbly Craveth yo^r Honors to grant them an
order ag^t M^r Robert Slye Administrator to the abouesaid Samuell
Smith for the said debt with Cost & Charge of suite And they shall
as in duty bound pray &c.
This Bill bindeth me Samuell Smith sometymes in the Province
of Maryland Mariner to pay or cause to be payd vnto Christopher
Russell of the same Province Planter good Goods for Thirteene
Hundred pounds of Porke, by me already received of the said Rus-
sell as I haue already solde or shall sell for Porke, att the Returne
of the Barque Susanna or by the last day of May next Ensueing the
date hereof, As Wittness my hand this 6^th day of March 1659
Testes W^m Clement Joseph Cooper signe [mark] . Sam: Smith
The plte sueth as in their peticon The def^t desires a Refference till
the next Co^rt and further desires that he may haue a Coppy of the
prte petⁿ and of the Bill which was ordered accordingly.

Hugh
Stanley
Admr to
Gyles
Sadleir v.
Rich Bentley
and Tho.
Searchwell
p. 1140
Hugh
Stanley Ad^r
to Gyles
Sadleir v.
Richard
Smith

The plt sueth for 1518^l Tobacco due by bill [from the] deft^s and
.... to be found ....

The plt sueth as in his petⁿ fo: The def^t produceth this following
Acc^o to shew wherefore that Tobacco was payd by the s^d Sadleir to
the s^d Scapes and as appeares by the acc^o more due.
The Opinion of the Board is that the plt hath noe Cause of action
therefore Non suited