clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1678-1679
Volume 68, Preface 11   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

INTRODUCTION

This volume, LXVIII, begins on October 8, 1678 and ends, with the end of
Liber NN of the proceedings of the Provincial Court, on October 16, 1679.
"Finis huius Iiber.", says Clerk Nicholas Painter. The jurisdiction of the
Court remains substantially as it had been. All important cases had to originate
in the Provincial Court, and minor cases might be heard there, if the Court
wanted to hear them. Cases appealed from county courts came to the Provincial
Court, whether on appeal or on writ of error. After November 1678 the person
appealing the county court decision had to give bond in double the sum from
which he was appealing to pursue the appeal and to pay the judgment, if the
Provincial Court sustained the lower court (Archives VII, 70-71). There are,
in these pages (post, 156, 244), examples of that kind of bond. As to chancery
cases, though the Court of Chancery had been set up in 1669, the same men
served in both courts, and both had the same clerk. It is, therefore, not
surprising that cases begun in one court sometimes appear later in the other
(post, 8o, 210).

In 1678 the justices of the Provincial Court were still members of the Upper
House of Assembly and of the Council, and justices of the Probate Court and
of the Chancery Court. For none of these offices did they get any salary. Most
of them, however, were wealthy holders of much land, and most of them held
some other well-paid office. In this period ten different men appeared as justices,
though nothing like all of them were present at any one session of the Court.
Philip Calvert, uncle of the Proprietary, was, besides being a justice, chancellor
and commissary general, and he held these lucrative offices until his death in
1682. As Justice of the Court, he was present at every session, and he gave
time to its other businesses. William Calvert, son of Governor Leonard, and
therefore cousin of Charles, third Lord Baltimore, was principal secretary in
addition to being justice. As secretary, he had a large and complicated revenue,
for he was keeper of the Provincial Court records and of the land records, and
he was also chief notary public. Like his uncle, Chancellor Phillip, he was present
at every sitting of the Court. Baker Brooke was surveyor general until his death
in office in March 1678/9. He attended the Court until he died. Henry Coursey,
who had been commissioned a justice in 1660 (Archives III, 394), served
regularly until 1670 (ibid. XLI, 507). At that time he disappears and does
not return to sit until 1676 (ibid. LXVI, 315), although he may well have been
held to be a member. He was made surveyor general in 1673, but, since he
lived and flourished on the Eastern Shore, he resigned his surveyorship. In
these sessions of the Provincial Court, he appears but once (post, i). He was,
at this time, giving much attention to the affairs of Kent and of Talbot County.
It was not that Coursey moved from one county to the other, but that Talbot
County was created out of Kent some time in early 1662. Like several of the
other counties, Talbot's erection was not marked by any official edict. In
April 1667 Col. Coursey was commissioned to make a treaty with the Susque-


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Provincial Court, 1678-1679
Volume 68, Preface 11   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives