clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Maryland Manual, 1994-95
Volume 186, Page 473   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Maryland Manual 1994-1995 Department of Transportation /473

affected the conduct of government, defense, and trade, Maryland government's concern with ensuring
modes of transportation dates from the seventeenth century.

In the colonial period, ships brought settlers and provided a link to Europe, the Caribbean, and Africa.
Maryland's abundant waterways, including Chesapeake Bay and navigable tidal rivers and creeks, served travel
and communication needs until settlement moved inland. Ferries were the first form of transport covered by law.
An act of 1638/9 provided for a ferry across St. George's River to enable persons to attend provincial assemblies
in St. Mary's City; toll was set at one pound of tobacco. By 1658, a more general need for ferries was expressed,
and the Assembly required each county, except Kent, to maintain a ferry out of the county tax levy. The 1658 act
made the county courts responsible for ferries, though ferry operations soon were assumed by private enterprise.
The county courts later became responsible for roads as well, and over the next two centuries, while the legislature
authorized the laying out, building, and repairing of roads and bridges, both public and private, the counties,
through commissioners or elected road commissioners, actually built and paid for them.

Public Roads. Maryland's first road law was passed in 1666. It ordered county commissioners to make
highways and paths passable for persons on horse and foot by 1668. In each county, overseers were to be
appointed, and either tobacco or labor was to be assessed against county taxables. Compelling county residents
to work a certain number of days per year on county roads was rooted in English custom, dating from feudal
times, and became a long-lasting tradition in Maryland. An act of 1704 also required roads to be made passable
but was more specific: the roads were to be cleared and grubbed to a width of twenty feet; substantial bridges
built where needed; trees alongside notched in such a way that the traveler could tell if the road led to a ferry,
courthouse, church, or to Annapolis or Williamstadt; the public roads recorded annually in the county records;
and fines set for any person failing to do his road duty. Despite the volume of road legislation in the eighteenth
century, travel on Maryland roads remained a harrowing experience according to contemporary accounts. Plenty
of roads were cleared, but few had improved surfaces of any kind. In 1787, Baltimore County was called upon
to fund and oversee several turnpikes leading to Baltimore Town (Chapter 23, Acts of 1787). The movement
westward required roads able to bear heavy wagons; the French and Indian War required a military supply road
to Fort Cumberland; post roads were needed for efficient communication and trade between colonies. County
labor and tax levies were unequal to growing demand. In 1793, convicts and vagrants were sentenced to work
on public roads (Chapter 57, Acts of 1793).

Private Turnpikes. Turnpikes played an important role in road development in Maryland. Although more
turnpike companies failed than succeeded, the best roads in the State were turnpikes. Some fell into disuse,
others reverted to the counties, but Maryland was unique in the number of private turnpikes which existed
into the twentieth century. The State Roads Commission purchased the last one in 1921. Turnpikes relieved
the counties of the financial burden of building and maintaining roads by investing private capital in what
had proved to be a monumental task and by making road users pay for upkeep. The legislature chartered
any number of private turnpike companies between 1787 and 1804 with limited success, as indicated by
an act of 1804 which mentions "the public expectation almost entirely frustrated" (Chapter 51, Acts of
1804). The companies incorporated under the 1804 act compensated Baltimore County for work
accomplished under the 1787 act and succeeded in building most of Maryland's major routes west.
However, no company sought incorporation to build the last connecting link to the National Road in
Cumberland without which trade from the interior would be lost. The legislature came up with a complex
scheme which tied together the renewal of bank charters, construction of the Cumberland Turnpike, and
funding for free schools (Chapter 122, Acts of 1813). By 1825, the major turnpikes in Maryland were
completed and, in their heyday, Baltimore was the terminus for seven pikes. In 1834, the federal
government turned over to Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Maryland those sections of the National Road
within their respective borders to become turnpikes. Maryland's legislature, in anticipation of federal action,
had already set tolls and provided for the appointment of one of the earliest State transportation officials,
the Superintendent of the National Road (Chapter 85, Acts of 1831).

Canals and Railroads. Paralleling the turnpike movement was the nationwide craze for internal improve-
ments, i.e., canals and railroads. George Washington himself was instrumental in setting up the Potomac
Company to open navigation on the Potomac River up to Cumberland by means of canals around the worst
rapids. In 1784, Maryland confirmed the charter issued by Virginia, and although the Potomac Company did
overcome some obstacles to navigation, it soon ran into debt (Chapter 33, Acts of 1784). A bi-state commission
in 1821 recommended abandoning the charter and the riverbed, and instead, perhaps inspired by the
near-completion of the Erie Canal, building a canal in the river valley from the Potomac to the Ohio River. The
legislature, hoping to recoup in part its financial investment in the Potomac Company, chartered the Chesapeake
and Ohio Canal Company in 1823 (Chapter 140, Acts of 1823). Baltimore interests expected no benefit from
the proposed canal, although a feeder canal to Baltimore had been considered, and on July 4,1828, as ground
was broken for the canal, it also was broken for the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (Chapter 123, Acts of 1826),



 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Maryland Manual, 1994-95
Volume 186, Page 473   View pdf image
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives