clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 546   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

546 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY.
other claims are all objected to for want of proof, and are not
legally proved. The Statute of Limitations is also relied on
against them, and is a bar, and there seems to be no objection
to a confirmation of the Auditor's report and accounts.
But since the statement of the account, the trustee has died,
and the administrator is brought into court on a petition, and
required to bring into court the purchase money received by
the trustee or by himself. There would be no difficulty in or-
dering the trustee to do so were he alive, nor in requiring the
same of the executor if he admitted, or it was proved that he
had received it, or that it was in his possession as administrator
sufficiently identified, or that he had sufficient assets of the tes-
tator in his hands. There is neither allegation, admission or
proof of the first two, nor as it appears to me, of the last. There
is certainly no allegation in the petition that the executor has
sufficient assets, nor is there any proof taken in reference to
them.
The executor, by his answer, denies that he has any cash
assets whatever, and does not admit that he has any other, or
to what amount. It is, therefore, this 20th day of June, 1848,
adjudged and ordered, that the Auditor's report and account,
filed March 4th, 1846, be, and the same is hereby ratified and
confirmed, and the petitioner has leave to amend his petition
if he think proper, so as to make a suficcient case against the
executor, and establish it by proof, or his petition must be dis-
missed.
[In pursuance of this order, the heirs at law amended their
petition against Dent, the executor of the deceased trustee,
Brawner, charging that Brawner left assets which have come
to the hands of said Dent, as executor, greatly more than suffi-
cient to pay all the debts and liabilities of every kind due by
Brawner; that Dent, as such executor, has sold large amounts
of property, and received large sums of money for the same,
which he now has in his hands, and that he has cash and other
assets more than sufficient to meet the petitioners' claims due
by said Brawner, but all other claims against him. The peti-

 
clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Reports of Cases in the High Court of Chancery of Maryland 1846-1854
Volume 200, Volume 4, Page 546   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives