clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 7   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769. 7


Bills were protested, and the same Sum has been by him since
remitted for Reimbursement of the said Bills.

Lib. J. R.

& U. S.

Also by the Deputy

1750. Samuel Chamberlaine's

p. 304

Naval Officer of

Bills, but dont say on whom,


Pocomoke

transmitted to the Trustees,



for which there is no Credit



by them for 31.. 7.. 6


But they credit the Province next Year his Bill on
William Anderson, not charged in his Naval Offi-
cer's Accounts for 27..0..0

Also the Naval Officer of Patuxent District in his Accounts
1755, charges the Province as follows :

To John Knight's Exchange on Johnson and

Company 53.. 6..3
And Edward Barnes on Spencer for 34.. 12..5

£87.. 18..8

Credit the Province by 15d per Hogshead on 995 Hogs-
heads of Tobacco 62.. 3.. 9
And charge the Ballance to next Account 25..14..11

£87..18..8

Which Ballance of £25 14s 11d he transfers to the
Debet of his next Year's Account against the Province
but it does not appear that the above two Bills, amounting
to £87 18S 8d were ever credited by the Trustees; yet by
their Account of the next Year they credited the Prov-
ince by John Hanbury on said Naval Officer's Account
£62 33 9d: from which we apprehend the said Bills were
not paid; and the said Naval Officer has ordered Mr
Hanbury to pay the nett Sum due only on the Tobacco,
by the preceding Account exported; by which the said
Ballance of £25 14s 11d carried to next Account again the
Province should have been again credited, and not being
so, is still due to the Province 25.. 14..11

And for Ballance of his Account 1756, he charges his
Order on William Perkins in Favour of Messieurs Hunt
and Hanbury remitted 319..18..4

And for Ballance of his Account 1757, his Exchange
on Mr William Perkins to be remitted to the Trustees by
the first Ship 286. 1..3

£631..14..6

But your Committee don't find that the Trustees have
credited the Province with the said Sums of £319..18.4: and
286..1..3: by which your Committee is induced to believe that


 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1761-1769
Volume 32, Page 7   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives