clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Executive Records, Governor Spiro T. Agnew, 1967-1969
Volume 83, Page 467   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

DRAFT CONSTITUTION'S PROVISIONS 467

Section 4. 17 Return of Veto Bills

Again the ten-day limitation is insufficient and a twenty-day limit is
the absolute minimum that should be exacted.

However, a major improvement exists wherein the Draft Constitu-
tion has removed the mandatory provision for immediate reconsidera-
tion of vetoed bills by the General Assembly.

Section 4. 18 Organization of Principal Departments

For a constitution to endure it must be flexible, providing direc-
tion rather than detail. This concept is recognized by the provisions
of Section 4. 18, authorizing and delegating the organization of the
executive and legislative branches to statutory determination. This
enables the State administration to adjust to changing responsibilities
without resorting to constitutional amendment. At the same time, I
share the view of the commission which prepared the Draft Constitu-
tion that the number of principal departments should be prescribed
by law.

Section 4. 19 Reorganization of Principal Departments

This measure provides the Governor with essential reorganizational
powers. Expanding and varying state problems virtually demand this
authorization of executive initiative. While I endorse the right of
the General Assembly to approve or disapprove any reorganization
plan presented by the Governor, I am concerned that the draft pro-
vision enables the General Assembly to modify any proposal.

Legislative ability to modify reorganization plans obscures the
clear lines of executive responsibility. Moreover, the General Assembly
may be unaware of the effect of modification on other executive func-
tions. Prohibition of the power to modify does not deny the legisla-
tive branch the right to propose administrative reorganization or to
reject it. It simply prevents revisions which might create a structure
deviating in part or entirety from the administration's original ob-
jectives.

Section 4. 20 Appointment and Removal of Administrative Officers

I fully accept the content of Section 4. 20. If gubernatorial policies
are to be implemented, it is essential to assure the cooperation of all
principal department heads through direct and unlimited line respon-
sibility.
Section 4. 21 Appointment and Removal of Administrative Boards

and Commissions

The provisions of Section 4. 21 refer to the multi-headed admin-
istrative unit. A series of policy-making boards and commissions has

 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Executive Records, Governor Spiro T. Agnew, 1967-1969
Volume 83, Page 467   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives