clear space clear space clear space white space
A
 r c h i v e s   o f   M a r y l a n d   O n l i n e

PLEASE NOTE: The searchable text below was computer generated and may contain typographical errors. Numerical typos are particularly troubling. Click “View pdf” to see the original document.

  Maryland State Archives | Index | Help | Search
search for:
clear space
white space
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 692   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space

692 INDEX.

government is limited, as well by its

Hammond, 316; Campbell's case, 209 ;

delegated nature, as by special consti-

Addison v. Bowie, 622; Waring v.

tutional restrictions. — Campbell's case,

Waring, 673.

231.

A creditor who has no common interest

The general assembly can constitution-

with other creditors, cannot sustain a

ally pass no law in violation of either

creditor's suit—Ellicott v. Welch, 245 ;

its general or special limitations, 232.

Hammond v. Hammond, 344; Andrews

An act of assembly may be declared void

v. Scotton, 660.

on the ground of its absurdity, apart

A creditor's suit may be engrafted upon

from any constitutional objection, 231.

a different suit then pending. — Ham-

No fact can be assumed by the legis-

mond v. Hammond, 346.

lature, to the prejudice of the rights

A creditor's suit may be sustained by a

of an individual, 230. — Worthington v.

surety, to save himself harmless. — El-

Lee, 686, note.

licott v. Welch, 245.

Property cannot by a legislative enact-

Who may or must be made parties to a

ment, or in any form, be taken from

creditor's suit. — Hammond v. Ham-

one man and given to another. — War-

mond, 347, 349.

ing v. Waring, 676.

The form and necessary allegations of a

 

creditor's bill, 349. — Anderson v. An-

CORPORATIONS.

derson, 387.

A corporation can only be called on to

On the establishment of the whole, or a

answer by its proper name. — Binney's
case, 106.

part of any one claim, and on the in-
sufficiency of the personalty being

Where the legal capacities of parties, as

shewn, there may be a decree for a

charged, are different, such capacities

sale of the realty. — Hammond v. Ham-

must be considered as if they were dif-

mond, 359; Chamberlain v. Brown,

ferent persons, 108.

221; Boucher v. Bradford, 222; Kilty

All corporations are subject to a visitato-

v. Brawn, 223; Hindman v. Clayton,

rial power, or to some legal control,

337; Tyson v. Hollingsworth, 329.

141, 142.

The decree for a sale, virtually esta-

In general, a corporation may alien all

blishes the plaintiff's claim, and the

or any of its property at pleasure, 141.
Stock held by the state, subject to the

insufficiency of the personalty, unless
otherwise expressly declared; except

same law as that of an individual cor-

as regards fraud, &e. not then in issue.

porator, 142.

Hammond v. Hammond, 359; Welch

Tne disposition of property, not for cor-

v. Stewart, 37; The State v. Brookes,

porate purposes, may be prohibited,
142.

42.

The plaintiff cannot be permitted to split

A corporation may be formed by the con-
current acts of several governments ;
but its real estate can only be dealt

up and multiply his causes of suit; if
he does, they will be rejected without
prejudice.— Welch v. Stewart, .37.

with by the judicial authority of the

The statute of limitations continues to

state in which it lies, 144, 149.

run until the creditor actually comes

A corporation may be created here, with
a view to foreign operations, 147.
A foreign corporation may be noticed,

in, 37.
No one can have the benefit of the statute,
after doing that which implies an aban-

and may sue here in the state courts,

donment of such a defence, 37.

147.

The controverted claims have a share as-

But the jurisdiction delegated to the fede-
ral courts, being confined to states and

signed them in the auditor's distribu-
tion, so that it may be confirmed as to

citizens, it is doubtful whether any cor-
poration can sue in them, 147.

those not contested, allowing them at
once to obtain so much as they are thus
admitted to be entitled to.-— The State

COSTS.

v. Brookes, 44; Tyson v. Hollings-

In a creditor's suit, the costs and expen-

worth, 335; Pattison v. Frazier, 381.

ses are always first paid. — Hammond

Lapse of time relied as a bar to a claim

v. Hammond, 385; Orchard v* Smith,

brought in under a creditor's bill. —

319.

Welch v. Stewart, 41; The State v.

In a creditor's suit, the costs incurred by

Brookes, 43.

the contestation of a particular claim,

An infant bound by his answer by guar-

not to be taxed to the prejudice of other
creditors. — Hammond v. Hammond,

dian od litem, in a creditors suit —
Hammond v. Hammond, 352; Bond v.

388.

Bond, 353; Mildred v. Neill, 354;

CREDITOR'S SUIT.
The various cases in which a creditor's
suit may be sustained,— Hammond v.

Hindman v. Clayton, 337; Flemming
v. Castle, 355; Ewing v. Ennals, 356 ;
Sprigg v, Magruder, 356; McMullin
v. Burris, 357.



 

clear space
clear space
white space

Please view image to verify text. To report an error, please contact us.
Bland's Reports, Chancery Court 1809-1832
Volume 201, Volume 2, Page 692   View pdf image (33K)
 Jump to  
  << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>


This web site is presented for reference purposes under the doctrine of fair use. When this material is used, in whole or in part, proper citation and credit must be attributed to the Maryland State Archives. PLEASE NOTE: The site may contain material from other sources which may be under copyright. Rights assessment, and full originating source citation, is the responsibility of the user.


Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!



An Archives of Maryland electronic publication.
For information contact mdlegal@mdarchives.state.md.us.

©Copyright  October 06, 2023
Maryland State Archives