government is limited, as well by its
|
Hammond, 316; Campbell's case, 209 ;
|
delegated nature, as by special consti-
|
Addison v. Bowie, 622; Waring v.
|
tutional restrictions. — Campbell's case,
|
Waring, 673.
|
231.
|
A creditor who has no common interest
|
The general assembly can constitution-
|
with other creditors, cannot sustain a
|
ally pass no law in violation of either
|
creditor's suit—Ellicott v. Welch, 245 ;
|
its general or special limitations, 232.
|
Hammond v. Hammond, 344; Andrews
|
An act of assembly may be declared void
|
v. Scotton, 660.
|
on the ground of its absurdity, apart
|
A creditor's suit may be engrafted upon
|
from any constitutional objection, 231.
|
a different suit then pending. — Ham-
|
No fact can be assumed by the legis-
|
mond v. Hammond, 346.
|
lature, to the prejudice of the rights
|
A creditor's suit may be sustained by a
|
of an individual, 230. — Worthington v.
|
surety, to save himself harmless. — El-
|
Lee, 686, note.
|
licott v. Welch, 245.
|
Property cannot by a legislative enact-
|
Who may or must be made parties to a
|
ment, or in any form, be taken from
|
creditor's suit. — Hammond v. Ham-
|
one man and given to another. — War-
|
mond, 347, 349.
|
ing v. Waring, 676.
|
The form and necessary allegations of a
|
 
|
creditor's bill, 349. — Anderson v. An-
|
CORPORATIONS.
|
derson, 387.
|
A corporation can only be called on to
|
On the establishment of the whole, or a
|
answer by its proper name. — Binney's
case, 106.
|
part of any one claim, and on the in-
sufficiency of the personalty being
|
Where the legal capacities of parties, as
|
shewn, there may be a decree for a
|
charged, are different, such capacities
|
sale of the realty. — Hammond v. Ham-
|
must be considered as if they were dif-
|
mond, 359; Chamberlain v. Brown,
|
ferent persons, 108.
|
221; Boucher v. Bradford, 222; Kilty
|
All corporations are subject to a visitato-
|
v. Brawn, 223; Hindman v. Clayton,
|
rial power, or to some legal control,
|
337; Tyson v. Hollingsworth, 329.
|
141, 142.
|
The decree for a sale, virtually esta-
|
In general, a corporation may alien all
|
blishes the plaintiff's claim, and the
|
or any of its property at pleasure, 141.
Stock held by the state, subject to the
|
insufficiency of the personalty, unless
otherwise expressly declared; except
|
same law as that of an individual cor-
|
as regards fraud, &e. not then in issue.
|
porator, 142.
|
Hammond v. Hammond, 359; Welch
|
Tne disposition of property, not for cor-
|
v. Stewart, 37; The State v. Brookes,
|
porate purposes, may be prohibited,
142.
|
42.
The plaintiff cannot be permitted to split
|
A corporation may be formed by the con-
current acts of several governments ;
but its real estate can only be dealt
|
up and multiply his causes of suit; if
he does, they will be rejected without
prejudice.— Welch v. Stewart, .37.
|
with by the judicial authority of the
|
The statute of limitations continues to
|
state in which it lies, 144, 149.
|
run until the creditor actually comes
|
A corporation may be created here, with
a view to foreign operations, 147.
A foreign corporation may be noticed,
|
in, 37.
No one can have the benefit of the statute,
after doing that which implies an aban-
|
and may sue here in the state courts,
|
donment of such a defence, 37.
|
147.
|
The controverted claims have a share as-
|
But the jurisdiction delegated to the fede-
ral courts, being confined to states and
|
signed them in the auditor's distribu-
tion, so that it may be confirmed as to
|
citizens, it is doubtful whether any cor-
poration can sue in them, 147.
|
those not contested, allowing them at
once to obtain so much as they are thus
admitted to be entitled to.-— The State
|
COSTS.
|
v. Brookes, 44; Tyson v. Hollings-
|
In a creditor's suit, the costs and expen-
|
worth, 335; Pattison v. Frazier, 381.
|
ses are always first paid. — Hammond
|
Lapse of time relied as a bar to a claim
|
v. Hammond, 385; Orchard v* Smith,
|
brought in under a creditor's bill. —
|
319.
|
Welch v. Stewart, 41; The State v.
|
In a creditor's suit, the costs incurred by
|
Brookes, 43.
|
the contestation of a particular claim,
|
An infant bound by his answer by guar-
|
not to be taxed to the prejudice of other
creditors. — Hammond v. Hammond,
|
dian od litem, in a creditors suit —
Hammond v. Hammond, 352; Bond v.
|
388.
|
Bond, 353; Mildred v. Neill, 354;
|
CREDITOR'S SUIT.
The various cases in which a creditor's
suit may be sustained,— Hammond v.
|
Hindman v. Clayton, 337; Flemming
v. Castle, 355; Ewing v. Ennals, 356 ;
Sprigg v, Magruder, 356; McMullin
v. Burris, 357.
|