|
64
|
1
|
longer introduce a new bill. I think this would account
|
2
|
for the relative ease with which Nebraska legislators
|
3
|
have grappled, if you will, with the bills that have been
|
4
|
introduced.
|
5
|
One other comment and then I am at your dis-
|
6
|
posal. I would suspect, although this again is a ques-
|
7
|
tion which is not incontrovertible, that the number of
|
8
|
candidates a voter has to know when he goes to the polls
|
9
|
to cast an intelligent vote has been slightly reduced in
|
10
|
Nebraska, and this might be a possible argument for a
|
11
|
unicameral system. I would venture to guess that this
|
12
|
has been of some possible benefit to Nebraska. Whether
|
13
|
it would be of similar benefit to other states, I have
|
14
|
no idea.
|
15
|
MR. ENEY: May I interrupt? Is this more from
|
16
|
the unicameral or from the nonpartisan aspect, in the
|
17
|
Nebraska system?
|
18
|
MR. KENTNER: I would say from the unicameral
|
19
|
rather than the nonpartisan.
|
20
|
MR. SCANLAN: Wouldn't it also be the fact that
|
21
|
they are single-member districts? Each one of them comes
|